Blogger Widgets

Sunday, 7 October 2012

North Korea, The Mystery Of Pyongyang




At what passes for rush hour on a Wednesday morning, there are few sounds in Kaesong's main traffic circle but the gentle squeak of bicycles and a tinny loudspeaker blaring anthems to Kim Jong Un, the baby-faced ruler who took power after his father's December death ("The footsteps of our respected General Kim! ... Spreading the sound of a brilliant future!").

Occasionally, a solitary car goes by.

There are no nightspots here, no modern apartment complexes, no electricity except for a few hours every evening. The shelves in most stores are noticeably half-empty, and dirt sidestreets lead to clusters of small houses, many little more than shacks, with bulging walls and broken roofs.

It is the reality of North Korean urban life – with the notable exception of the capital city, 80 miles north of here, in a carefully crafted totalitarian Oz. That contrast, between Pyongyang and every other city in the country, reflects an ever-growing chasm between North Korea's elite and the daily struggles of everyone else.

Pyongyang has the Dolphinarium, a cavernous aquarium where smiling, fresh-faced trainers in skintight-suits make dolphins dance for ecstatic crowds. There's the new 3,000-unit Changjon Street apartments, lit up like a movie set long into the night, a proclamation that North Korea has electricity to spare. It has the Sunrise Restaurant, the latest destination for the city's nouveau riche, where tough-looking men drink grape Fanta from brandy snifters while their drivers wait outside with their Land Cruisers. It has good government jobs and the country's top university.

"When I finally saw Pyongyang, it was so wonderful, so incredible," said Kim Jong Hui, a cheerful 51-year-old from the northeastern city of Chongjin. She had traveled for two days on North Korea's decrepit rail network to make her first visit to the capital city for a series of national day celebrations.

Kim spent a recent afternoon watching friends play on the country's only putt-putt golf course, a small maze of plastic greens set between a new amusement park and a new swimming complex. "It's more exciting here, and more beautiful."

If North Korea can appear outwardly stagnant, a country frozen by poverty and Soviet economic policies, a small but resonant market economy has taken root over the past 15 years or so. While the country still has a per capita GDP of just $1,800 per year, according to U.S. figures, this new economy – a mix of underground trading, investment funds, particularly from China, and the growth of government-authorized commercial enterprises – has helped reshape Pyongyang.


Today, the Pyongyang rich, spending their dollars, euros and Chinese yuan, can buy everything from high heels to imported watches. They have bought enough cars in the past couple years to cause the occasional traffic jam.

But few of these changes have gone beyond the capital, and the elite who live there.

"Pyongyang is not just another city," said a doctor who spent most of his life in Kaesong, but who was educated in the capital. The doctor, who eventually fled to South Korea, spoke on condition of his name not be used, fearing retribution against relatives still living in the North. "It's like another country."

The urban divide can be seen in the industrial city of Hamhung, where the skies above the handful of working factories are filled with gray soot, and workers are ferried to the beach on their day off in crowded, cobbled-together trucks powered by wood-burning stoves. It's visible on the "Youth Hero Highway" outside the port city of Nampho, where there are so few cars on the eight-lane road that it looks like an empty parking lot stretching toward the horizon.

It's in the province around Chongjin, where U.N. data shows the rate of abnormally short children – a key indicator of chronic malnutrition – is 50 percent higher than around Pyongyang.

It's in Kaesong, where residents even have a little extra money because so many work in South Korean-owned factories in the nearby industrial zone, but who still see themselves as poor country cousins to people from the capital. Few from this city, though, ever move to Pyongyang. Kaesong was part of South Korea before the Korean War, and many of its residents are seen as potential security risks because of family ties to the south.

You can find it in the hospitals of those second-tier cities, according to people who have fled North Korea, and who spoke on condition their names not be used, fearing it would cause trouble for their relatives. They say desperate doctors struggle to treat patients with almost no medicine, using equipment that can be decades old.

It's not an issue North Koreans will discuss with outsiders, especially not foreign journalists accompanied by government minders. But the contrast is obvious, and people who have fled the country, along with analysts and academics, say the discrepancies cause widespread frustration.

Like so much else in North Korea, the urban divide is really about the politics of single-family rule.

Pyongyang grew after the Korean War into a showcase of Stalinist propaganda, a city of hulking government buildings, enormous stadiums, broad avenues and omnipresent monuments celebrating the lives of founding ruler Kim Il Sung and his son and successor, Kim Jong Il.

It was proof to the world, the regime believed, of the victory of totalitarian socialism. More importantly, it was also a way to reward the regime's key supporters, and to keep them close.

Pyongyang is a closed city, sealed off by security forces that monitor movement at dozens of checkpoints. North Koreans cannot move there, or even visit, without official permission. Its estimated 3 million residents have been vetted for their ideological purity, or at least their connections to the inner circle.

In many ways, the capital is a complex mixture of facade and reality: blackouts remain commonplace in many neighborhoods; backstreets are dusty and potholed; the outsides of many apartment buildings are splattered with patches of mold.

But life is also far less grim than in the rest of the country. If nothing else, there is the appearance of opportunity.

Top officials in the ruling party, the government and the military live in gated neighborhoods closed to outsiders. They shop in stores filled with goods, and sing karaoke in wood-paneled restaurants. They live and work in constant proximity to power, opening up channels for professional promotion, business opportunities and black market profits.

So when the regime needs to ensure support, it knows where it needs to focus.

"The government is privileging Pyongyang as a political strategy," said Glyn Ford, a former European Union parliamentarian and international consultant who travels regularly and widely in North Korea. "The people who live in the capital are the people who count. They're the people who underpin the regime."

Their support is particularly important right now, with the ascension of third-generation leader Kim Jong Un, who clearly sees his political survival linked to improved standards of living.

His grandfather, Kim Il Sung, was an anti-colonial guerrilla who led the country during North Korea's Cold War heyday, when the Soviets showered the country with everything from oil to food. Things grew desperate in the next generation, when Kim Jong Il hardened the police state and launched a nuclear program that made the country an international pariah. He led the country through a mid-1990s famine that foreign economists believe killed hundreds of thousands of people.

Now, with Kim Jong Un's abrupt rise to power, Pyongyang is getting even more.

In just the past few months, the regime has opened the Dolphinarium (which also required a new 30-mile pipeline to pump in fresh seawater), a $19 million amusement park and an elaborate pool-and-water-slide complex. All are filled with adults, and all are wildly popular.

Even in Pyongyang, the top restaurants and karaoke parlors are too expensive for the rank-and-file supporters – everyone from party bureaucrats to low-ranking soldiers to schoolteachers – who also need to be kept happy.

Outside of Pyongyang, certainly, there are no $19 million amusement parks.

Asked what Kaesong residents do for enjoyment, a city official paused to think. There's the pool, Kim Ryong Mun said eventually, though it's really just for children. Finally, he had something: "Many people go outside and have picnics."

Kim, with his faded, blue-striped tie and digital camera hanging from his wrist as a sign of his success, blames international sanctions, imposed because of Pyongyang's nuclear program, for the lack of development.

"We are suffering because of the imperialist powers," he said, standing near his new chauffeur-driven car in the city center. Nearby, an elderly woman pushed a homemade wheelbarrow filled with bricks. A little later, a man rode by on his bicycle, with handmade shovels tied to it with twine.

Kaesong has "the determination to build a more prosperous city," Kim said, reciting a propaganda phrase that has become commonplace since the rise of the latest Kim.

"The problem of electricity is now solved," he said, when pressed about what needed to be done.

But how can that be, if there are only a few hours of power?

"We supply electricity in the evening, so people can enjoy their lives," he said. During the daytime, he added, the electricity goes to small factories. "This is normal."

On a recent evening, most lights were out by 10 p.m. Occasionally, though, you could see the orange glow of a cigarette, as a cyclist smoked as he rode home in the darkness.

And somewhere to the north, the lights of Pyongyang's amusement parks shone brightly.

 

source huff post

How Pwajok clinches Plateau North senatorial bye election

Gyang Pwajok


The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Sunday declared the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s candidate in the Plateau North Senatorial bye-election, Gyang Pwajok the winner of the elections held in six local government areas which constitute the northern senatorial zone.

Candidates representing six political parties – Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), People’s Democratic Party (PDP), All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), Democratic People’s Party (DPP), All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) and the Labour Party (LP), contested election to replace Senator Gyang Dantong, who died on July 8, in a stampede when gunmen attacked mourners at Maseh, a village in Riyom District.

However, only three candidates contested the bye-election for the vacant position in the state house of assembly.

In spite of the heavy downpour, the electorates were not deterred as they troop out to exercise their civic rights to cast their votes. The young and the old were all out to determine the representative in their zone.

Security arrangement was beef up with security chiefs going round the zone to ensure that there was no breach of peace, with plateau state police commissioner, Dipo Ayeni leading the patrol team on inspection.

Announcing the results for the senatorial bye-election at the INEC collation centre in Jos, the Returning Officer for the zone, Professor Fatima Sawa of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi pronounced the PDP candidate as winners having scored majority votes and satisfied the requirements according to the electoral law.

The PDP candidate, Pwajok polled 195,349 votes to floor other contestants who polled the following votes; Colonel John Dungs (rtd) of DPP – 38,847; Chris Giwa  of APGA – 36,245; Danladi Atu of ANPP – 30,132; Jonathan Yusufu Pam of CAN – 27,609; Dah Adeh Lumumba of LP – 25,527

In the Plateau state house of assembly elections for Barkin Ladi constituency, Kaneng Gyang Fulani of PDPemerged winners with 33, 549 votes to defeat two other contestants, Bulus Bot of DPP with 6, 718 and Ezekiel Gyang of ACN with 4, 267

BAKASSI: Why Nigeria can’t appeal the ICJ verdict – Robert Clarke


Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Robert Clarke (SAN), who is the Principal Partner, Paiko & Co, implores the Federal Government to resettle Nigerians living in Bakassi instead of allowing a revolt which, according to him, may have a spiral effect in the country. The septuagenarian, in this interview, insists that Nigeria erred by submitting to the International Court of Justice(ICJ) and has no option than to abide by the decision of the ICJ on the peninsula. Excerpts:
Some believe that Nigeria traded off Bakassi. Do you think that was right?
I will not say whether somebody was right or wrong but I will first like to analyse the facts. The question is that at the  time former President Obasanjo decided to enter into the Green-Tree Agreement with Cameroun, what were the facts, the fact on ground was that there was a judgment of the International Court of Justice in 2002.
By majority decision in which our eminent jurist Ajibola sat, it ruled that Bakassi did not belong to Nigeria, nothing was done on that judgment since 2002. By 2005, Obasanjo felt he should look at it. I am not holding brief for him but the fact is that by 1914 when Nigeria became one nation, the map of Nigeria as at that time did not contain Bakassi.  So, Bakassi was not part of Nigeria.
But at what time did Bakassi become part of Nigeria? If Nigeria became a nation in 1914, and Bakassi was not part of it, and it later became part of Nigeria, we need to know under what circumstances.  Bakassi later became part of Nigeria in 1918 when Hitler’s colonies all over Africa were taken away from the Germans- Tanzania, Namibia, Togo and Cameroun were German territories up to November 1919.
And by the Amnesty treaty, the League of Nations decided to take away all the German colonies in Africa and brought them under the trusteeship of the League of Nations. So, the League of Nations said they had taken all these territories from the Germans, and who is going to look after them? At that time, they divided Togo into two as well as Cameroun.
Gold Coast took over half of Togo while they gave the Northern Cameroun to Nigeria and they gave the other part to France. That was how Bakassi became part of Nigeria as a ‘trusteeship’ entity and not as a separate entity. Now, in 1958 when Ghana was to become independent, the United Nations asked the Togolese, ‘Do you want to remain in Ghana (Gold Coast) or you want to go back to the French territories ‘as Togo because Togo had not gotten independent then, it was under the French rule?

Chief Robert Clarke
They decided that they didn’t want to go back to Togo. It is just like Nigeria where you have the Anagoge and Yoruba in Benin Republic, do we say because they are Yoruba, they are Nigerians? No. They opted to stay in Ghana. In 1960, Nigerian was to become independent and Nigeria as an entity to be independent was devoid of Bakassi. If they granted us independence, it would only be the area Nigeria was in 1914. So, they asked the same question that ‘you Camerounians, do you want to remain in Nigeria or you want to go back to the French  territories’? (then Cameroun had not taken independence).
The Northern Camerounians decided to stay with Nigeria, but the Easterners who are the Bakassi and West Cameroun, as they were known then said no, that they had not been treated well by the regional government. Of course they were not the only ones that complained,  Cross River also complained. So, they opted to go back to the French Cameroun.
There was a plebiscite and it was approved by the United Nations. That was the legal position of the area as at 1960. The question then became how are we going to re-draw Nigeria’s map? The problem however started in 1966 when General Yakubu Gowon took over government. The gendarmes thought that since Nigeria was at war, it was time to attack Nigeria, so they sent soldiers into Bakassi.
Gowon told them that he did not want to fight a war, he was already fighting a civil war and he said ‘let us divide Bakassi into two so that we both keep our part’. It is also a wrong notion when people say that Gowon sold out Bakassi. When Shagari came in, nothing was done, and when Abacha came in, the gendarmes attacked again, and Abacha wanted to fight a war, they showed him that Nigeria can’t fight a war because we don’t own it.
So, Abacha set up a panel with Akinjide, Ajibola and others as members to look into it and they decided that we had a better title than the Camerounians and that was what led them to submitting to the World Court on the notion that history is the cornerstone of Nigeria rulership. That was the greatest mistake Nigeria made by submitting to the World Court. You are bound to carry out the judgment; if you don’t, the United Nations Security Council will enforce it.
So, Obasanjo, who knew all the facts, and with his wide experience internationally, he opted to make the best out of nothing. According to him, ‘we have spent so much to develop the area, we cannot just lose out completely, let us agree on some economic terms’ and they drew out a 20-year economic term whereby they allotted certain oil blocs to Nigeria and, after 20 years, it will be reviewed. Obasanjo did not take any step in isolation; he was acting in pursuant to the international law.
What options are then open for Nigeria and what is the position of self-determination of the people in all of these?
Under international law, wherever you settle down, you are bound by the law of that area. If you go to Benin Republic today, one-third of the people are Yoruba; would you say they are Nigerians? No. If you go to Equatorial Guinea today, in the good old days, the Igbo  were going there as plantation workers, you have many of them there who have intermarried.
Today,  in that country, half of the population are Igbo. Can we say the Igbo  in that country are Nigerians? Since they have decided to settle there, they must abide by the rules of the country. The fact that the Cross River people moved into Bakassi over 100 years ago to settle down does not mean that they own the place.
The international law has now adjudged that they do not own the place, the best they can do is to accept that they are not the owners and leave the area as their parents have been doing and decide to come back to Nigerian as refugees if they are not happy with the treatment there. Government now owes it as a duty to rehabilitate them when they come back.
That is a duty we owe them because being refugees is not of their own making; it is our government who sold them out to international court. Why should they suffer? If they are being harassed, let the government wade in, build rehabilitation centres for them and set them up. Nigeria has money to spend instead of individuals pocketing the money.
The international court gave us the opportunity that if there is anything wrong in this judgment, we should review it and they will look into it. We never did that, but typical of Nigerians’ way of doing things, you now say you want to appeal in just three weeks.
Was it solely as a result of our complacency or we don’t have a fact to push forward?
One, we don’t have a fact to push forward. Again, the government of Obasanjo has already taken a decision for us in his own wisdom to get the best for Nigeria by signing an economic pact with them. So, there is nothing we can do again. There are certain oil blocs that have been allocated to Nigeria, at least for 20 years. And if you look at the terms of this agreement, it can only be reviewed in 2028. That is the advantage we can leverage on.
But don’t you think the killing of Nigerians in the area by gendarmes is a violation of the Green-Tree Treaty entered into by Cameroun?
That is human behaviour. What is happening in Sierra Leone and Ghana today has nothing to do with Nigerians. The best we can do is to use diplomatic means. Nigeria cannot send any troop into Bakassi today. If we do, the United Nations Security Council will ask us to clear out within 24 hours.
We are not Israel that has been occupying Palestinian state for so many years. There is nothing we can do; we just have to tell ourselves the truth. Apart from asking your people to leave and rehabilitating them, any other thing will be a violation of the international law.
But the people might have felt that they were rather short-changed by the Nigerian Government for not being able to defend them, what is your advice for the people and government of Nigeria on the issue?
My advice is that Nigeria should live up to its obligations. When the Federal Government of Nigeria has entered into economic relationship on Bakassi, she should have allowed her people who want to return to Nigeria do so and let them know that if they return, they are not going to lose anything.
So, instead of allowing organised revolt in another sovereign country, because it may backfire in Nigeria, let our government make arrangement with the neighbouring states like Akwa Ibom, and Cross Rivers, and make available an economic situation where these people can return and be re-settled. Sovereignty is so important in international law that you are bound to obey the laws of the sovereign state.




source - vanguard

Saturday, 6 October 2012

wife declares in court that her husband is a thief



An eight-year-marriage between Mr  Adeloba Ogunrinde and his wife, Taiwo, has hit the rocks as the court separated the couple over the allegation that the husband stole the proceeds from the wife’s  kerosene and recharge cards business.
Taiwo, 32,  begged an  Agege Grade A Customary  Court to separate them, maintaining that the continuation of the marriage will ruin her life and business.
The wife said her business was going into comatose by the perpetual habit of her husband to  steal the little money she made from it.
She added that her mother transferred the business to her in order for her to make ends meet.  ” But instead of contributing to the growth of the business,  my husband doesn’t want me to progress, he stole the whole money and make me a debtor”.
Taiwo said that her parents rescued her again by giving her N80,000 which she invested in  the trade, but she could not afford to rent a shop.  She claimed that her husband hardly gave her feeding allowance, adding that he gave his children N200 once in a week.
According to her,  she had to pack out of Adeloba’s house when she  realised that the burden was so much on her as her husband hardly paid  N10,000 out of  their children’s N40,000 school fees.
Adeloba denied the allegations and claimed that he had  been paying N25,000  school fees, and N10,000 monthly feeding allowance.  The court said since it could not  force  two unwilling adults  together, it  had no choice than to dissolve the marriage.
It therefore ordered that custody of the children should remain with Taiwo while Adeloba would pay N55,000 for education and N5,000 for medicals.

Friday, 5 October 2012

True Confession: Woman who sold her child for N4 million in Nigeria




NOTE: After this confession, I will close this email and you may not be able to reach me through it again. This is for identity reason, as I have been warned not to disclose this. I also know that NAPTIP or how do they call them, will come after me. I need to avoid this. I’m not educated, but I have to trust someone to write this piece for me for your newspaper. At least I can read, so I can monitor all the comments that will pour in as a result of my distasteful act. I’m ready to receive any kind of insult, and possibly commit suicide if…

This is not fictitious. I confess with tears streaming from my eyes. Do not pity me. I don’t pity myself. I consider myself a greedy fool who doesn’t even deserve to live for just another day.

Permit me to tell you how it all started. I had a child out of wedlock. I couldn’t have taken the child to any particular man because none was going to accept him either. This is because of the kind of life I have lived as a young girl of 24. Quite frankly, I was a prostitute. I can’t tell who the father of my baby is, even as I make this confession. I decided to keep the child just to avoid all the embarrassment associated with this.

I live in lagos. It is difficult to survive down here, considering that I also had a baby to care for. My baby was just 9 months when it all happened. I was fed up with life, and I told one of my friends that I was ready to sell my baby to survive so long as I know he would be safe. She passively laughed at my ignoble assertion. However, two weeks after we discussed, some people called me from the North, that they would like to meet me. I thought they were my usual customers, until I saw two men in my small apartment three days later. They said they were informed that I was willing to sell my child. I asked how they got to know, and they showed me their identity cards. They were police officers and had been asked to do the transaction with me on behalf of a man whose identity they kept secret.

At first, I was scared. And I told them angrily that I was not that kind of person. They were so persistent that they even showed me the cheque signed by one of the officers. I ordered them out of my room and they left that day. I thought they would be calling me to bother me, but they didn’t. I was full of regrets. I was caught in between constant thought of the money and the adverse effect of losing my child to a total stranger. Different ideas were circling in my head, until I took one last decision. I picked up my phone after three days of my meeting with the police officers and I asked them to come down as I had accepted to do the transaction. They had warned me that it won’t be very funny if at the end I still go ahead to treat them the way they were treated the last time they came; but I assured them of my total cooperation.

They came again the next day. I was sobbing when they walked in. Yes, I was crying for my child because I knew that after that day, I won’t see him again. They came in a police van, apparently to take my child away with it. They said the Alhaji who wanted the child was waiting. I asked whether my child was going to be killed. They took pity on me and told me that the man who wanted the child never had a child, and that had occasioned their trip down to the lagos in search of a child. They assured me that nothing was going to happen to the child, but that I should take my mind off my baby, as I was never going to see him again. They said that after the payment had been made, the child would cease to be mine. I wept as I handed over my child to one of them who sat at the back of the van. We drove to one of the banks where the transaction took place. Sincerely, my account was credited and they left. Ten minutes after their departure, I collapsed in the bank premises in tears, leaving many people to wonder what could be wrong with me. I called them to return my child but they said it was too late.

The painful aspect of my trouble is that I didn’t use the money to do any reasonable thing. As I speak to you, my account has gone down, and I can’t really point to any reasonable thing I have done with the money, apart from the car that I bought few months after the incident. People around me don’t know what happened to my child as I keep telling them that my baby is with my mum in the village.

I’m making this confession because I doubt if I may survive this CURSE I have brought upon myself. The last cry of my baby re-echoes each time I’m alone. I hear him cry into the silence of the night when I’m alone in my room. I have not known peace since I sold my child. I have had accident up to ten times since the fateful day. None of the accidents was unconnected to absence minded.

The guilt continues to live in me. Now, I’m contemplating suicide. All I want is your advice as I find very useful comments on this site each time I log in with my phone. I hardly make comments but I read your blog a lot. Please tell me what to do. I want to get my child back, but I don’t even have a clue on what to do. I don’t even know exactly where my child is now. I think I have been so foolish. Don’t feel any remorse for me. Give me the best advice – exactly what you would tell your sister if she found herself in my shoes. I am waiting.

Editor’s Note:

If you would like to respond to this private problem, please post comments below. When leaving a message on this page, be sensitive to the fact that you are responding to a real person in the grip of real-life dilemma, who wrote to WINGRASSNEWS asking for help, and may as well view your comments. Please consider how the tone of your message could be perceived by someone trapped in this kind of impasse.

If you would like fellow readers to respond to a dilemma of yours, send us an outline of the situation of about 200 words to our Email, wingrassnews@gmail.com.