Blogger Widgets

Monday, 8 October 2012

How Dino Melaye impregnated me by Bisi Ibidapo-obe, star Yoruba actress

Dino Melaye

The development, which is currently a subject of discussion among family members and close friends of both the actress and politician, is becoming messier by the day, as Bisi’s fiance, who is said to be a staff of NNPC is said to be currently in a dilemma.
The parents of Bisi’s fiance had insisted that the actress must get pregnant before they can get married .  Now, Bisi is pregnant, but for a different man.
In an interview, the actress admitted that though her relationship with Melaye was very brief and they had not planned to have a baby but fate and circumstances proved her wrong.
Explaining how she met the ex-lawmaker, Bisi said “I actually met Dino through Lola Alao sometime in March or early April and honestly speaking, I was in need of help and Lola Alao promised she would introduce me to someone who could help me. The person turned out to be Dino.
“I  visited him in Abuja and  he was actually forthcoming and helpful. I was not the only one involved then but he took particular interest in me. We got to know each other and at a point I was scared because he was all over me. Over time, he showed me he meant well and we became good friends.
Bisi Ibidapo-Obe
“Somehow, one thing led to the other and we started dating. He appeared nice, loving and showed me a lot of affection. He was quite frequent in my Lagos house. I remember when he came to Lagos for the birthday of Asiwaju Bola Tinubu, I went to pick him from the airport to my house.
“We were an item and it was known to a couple of our close friends in the industry.  It was while in Canada with my colleagues, Foluke Daramola and Moji Olaiya, that I  realised that I was pregnant. I could not believe it. It was painful because I could not participate in all the programmes lined up for us in Canada.  I can remember that it was Moji Olaiya that went to buy the pregnancy kit that later confirmed I was pregnant.
Immediately, I called Dino in Nigeria and shared the news with him. He was excited about it and he told me he was looking forward to seeing me in Lagos soon. When I returned, he received me with joy and on an occasion he took me to his hometown, Kabba in Kogi State. He told me he wanted to marry me. He was so nice to me.
“Sometime in May, I went to London, came back and he called me. He said  that he actually wanted a big society wedding with me but since his parents are clerics and the rules and regulation of their church frowns at pregnant brides he would want me to get rid of the pregnancy.
“I was shocked. I wept uncontrollably all night. I called him several times but he refused to pick my calls. I sent friends to him but he refused to listen to me. His complaint, according to my friends, was that I was rude.
“He stopped picking my calls. But each time I try to call him with another phone number, he would pick the call but as soon as he finds out I’m the one on the phone he will drop it. I have not wronged Dino, I have only chosen to do what is right but he sees it differently.  I’m no longer a kid.
“It’s painful that such action is coming from a man who claims to love the masses, the oppressed people of this country and he is oppressing me. My fate is in the hands of God and He will see me through. I have not been working to earn any money but I have found favour before God and a couple of my friends. I know I’m not alone in this. God is with me.
Bisi  insisted she will not abort the pregnancy.
In his response, Dino described Bisi’s claims as an “Africa Magic’s story and an expression of fiction.”

Sunday, 7 October 2012

My degree is better than yours, By Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani



Many Nigerian students want to school abroad, but their return can cause tensions in the workplace …Photo: Nigeria’s Broadstreet…Lagos
My friend’s niece has been sulking and shedding tears.  She does not want to attend university in Nigeria.  Government officials here send their children abroad to school.  Families that can afford it also do the same.  It is rare to find anyone with an alternative choosing to stay behind.
“All my friends are going to school abroad,” the girl said.  “I want to go abroad, even if it’s Ghana.”
Beyond the quality of education, the looming possibility of disruptive lecturer strikes and student unrest are further deterrents to schooling here.  I spent six years at the University of Ibadan, studying a four-year course.  In addition, it is easier to pass through the eye of a needle than to gain admission into a Nigerian university without having connections or paying bribes.  The schools abroad usually welcome you with wide open arms once you meet their basic requirements and pay their hefty foreign student fees.  Admission without tears.
There is another reason why Nigerian students are heading overseas in droves.  They have learnt by association, by observing action and reaction.  The most highly acclaimed Nigerians, in almost every field of endeavour, have been trained abroad.  Those who return home automatically have elevated status thrust upon them.  They get the juiciest positions, the highest salaries, and the greatest respect.
As the recent global financial meltdown flushes more and more people from the diaspora back here, the rumbles of discontent among the “homeschooled” – those who studied here – are gradually increasing.  Anyone who cares to listen will hear their bitter complaints.  And the resentment goes beyond watching the repatriates pluck choice jobs from right under the locals’ noses.  Other charges abound as well.
“They think they are better than the rest of us,” someone said to me.   “They treat us with contempt, as if we don’t know anything.” “All they do is find fault and criticise.  They don’t realise that the way we do things here is different from over there.”
In many cases, these sour feelings morph into outright office warfare.  An Abuja worker told me that he was determined to watch one UK-trained consultant at his workplace “fail”.
“I just make sure that I do the little bit I’m meant to do, and nothing more,” he said.  “Since she thinks the rest of us don’t know anything, she can go ahead and do everything herself.”
His other “homeschooled” colleagues took the same stance.  Together, the department was determined to make that consultant’s life hell.
My friend, Ngozika, experienced this kind of hostility a few years ago.  After returning with a master’s degree from the UK, she was given a top position at a Nigerian bank.
“The staff were so cold and hostile,” she said.
Later, she found out that they had jointly decided to give the “chick from the UK” a hard time.
Some argue that the repatriates’ condescending attitude could simply be a reaction to the half-baked skills of many graduates from Nigerian universities. Employers complain that you often have to put them through a series of training sessions before they can be of the most basic use to you.  Others say that the repatriates, as skilled and knowledgeable as they may be, usually lack the native sense required to excel—and survive—in the extremely peculiar Nigerian working environment.  It usually takes at least one grave failure before their eyes finally open to the fact that Nigeria is not designed to work the same way as the USA or Australia.
Ugochi Bede worked for the Nigerian offices of an international recruitment company. For years, she found both locals and repatriates for some top Nigerian companies.  She’s noted that returnees can lack the sensitivity to appease the resentment from their local colleagues – and so ignite a great deal of hostility that obstructs their work.
“But they usually have better work ethics,” she said.
You rarely find the repatriates doing things like selling dried stock fish or designer shoes in the office, or taking three weeks’ leave because their great-grandmother died.
Actually, none of this is new.  The same conflict played out vehemently between Nigerian employees and their expatriate colleagues both before and after independence in 1960. But this current crisis is different.  The two warring camps both have a right to be here. They are all Nigerian by birth.
At this rate, a foreign degree may soon become essential for anyone wanting to gain top employment in Nigeria.  More and more revenue will flow from here to the foreign schools while this country’s own educational system continues to suffer.
(This piece first appeared on the BBC World Service Radio programme http://www.bbc.co.uk/i/p00yk1nm/)
Adaobi Tricia Nwaubani is the author of the novel, I Do Not Come to You by Chance, winner of the 2010 Commonwealth Writers Prize for Best First Book (Africa).

North Korea, The Mystery Of Pyongyang




At what passes for rush hour on a Wednesday morning, there are few sounds in Kaesong's main traffic circle but the gentle squeak of bicycles and a tinny loudspeaker blaring anthems to Kim Jong Un, the baby-faced ruler who took power after his father's December death ("The footsteps of our respected General Kim! ... Spreading the sound of a brilliant future!").

Occasionally, a solitary car goes by.

There are no nightspots here, no modern apartment complexes, no electricity except for a few hours every evening. The shelves in most stores are noticeably half-empty, and dirt sidestreets lead to clusters of small houses, many little more than shacks, with bulging walls and broken roofs.

It is the reality of North Korean urban life – with the notable exception of the capital city, 80 miles north of here, in a carefully crafted totalitarian Oz. That contrast, between Pyongyang and every other city in the country, reflects an ever-growing chasm between North Korea's elite and the daily struggles of everyone else.

Pyongyang has the Dolphinarium, a cavernous aquarium where smiling, fresh-faced trainers in skintight-suits make dolphins dance for ecstatic crowds. There's the new 3,000-unit Changjon Street apartments, lit up like a movie set long into the night, a proclamation that North Korea has electricity to spare. It has the Sunrise Restaurant, the latest destination for the city's nouveau riche, where tough-looking men drink grape Fanta from brandy snifters while their drivers wait outside with their Land Cruisers. It has good government jobs and the country's top university.

"When I finally saw Pyongyang, it was so wonderful, so incredible," said Kim Jong Hui, a cheerful 51-year-old from the northeastern city of Chongjin. She had traveled for two days on North Korea's decrepit rail network to make her first visit to the capital city for a series of national day celebrations.

Kim spent a recent afternoon watching friends play on the country's only putt-putt golf course, a small maze of plastic greens set between a new amusement park and a new swimming complex. "It's more exciting here, and more beautiful."

If North Korea can appear outwardly stagnant, a country frozen by poverty and Soviet economic policies, a small but resonant market economy has taken root over the past 15 years or so. While the country still has a per capita GDP of just $1,800 per year, according to U.S. figures, this new economy – a mix of underground trading, investment funds, particularly from China, and the growth of government-authorized commercial enterprises – has helped reshape Pyongyang.


Today, the Pyongyang rich, spending their dollars, euros and Chinese yuan, can buy everything from high heels to imported watches. They have bought enough cars in the past couple years to cause the occasional traffic jam.

But few of these changes have gone beyond the capital, and the elite who live there.

"Pyongyang is not just another city," said a doctor who spent most of his life in Kaesong, but who was educated in the capital. The doctor, who eventually fled to South Korea, spoke on condition of his name not be used, fearing retribution against relatives still living in the North. "It's like another country."

The urban divide can be seen in the industrial city of Hamhung, where the skies above the handful of working factories are filled with gray soot, and workers are ferried to the beach on their day off in crowded, cobbled-together trucks powered by wood-burning stoves. It's visible on the "Youth Hero Highway" outside the port city of Nampho, where there are so few cars on the eight-lane road that it looks like an empty parking lot stretching toward the horizon.

It's in the province around Chongjin, where U.N. data shows the rate of abnormally short children – a key indicator of chronic malnutrition – is 50 percent higher than around Pyongyang.

It's in Kaesong, where residents even have a little extra money because so many work in South Korean-owned factories in the nearby industrial zone, but who still see themselves as poor country cousins to people from the capital. Few from this city, though, ever move to Pyongyang. Kaesong was part of South Korea before the Korean War, and many of its residents are seen as potential security risks because of family ties to the south.

You can find it in the hospitals of those second-tier cities, according to people who have fled North Korea, and who spoke on condition their names not be used, fearing it would cause trouble for their relatives. They say desperate doctors struggle to treat patients with almost no medicine, using equipment that can be decades old.

It's not an issue North Koreans will discuss with outsiders, especially not foreign journalists accompanied by government minders. But the contrast is obvious, and people who have fled the country, along with analysts and academics, say the discrepancies cause widespread frustration.

Like so much else in North Korea, the urban divide is really about the politics of single-family rule.

Pyongyang grew after the Korean War into a showcase of Stalinist propaganda, a city of hulking government buildings, enormous stadiums, broad avenues and omnipresent monuments celebrating the lives of founding ruler Kim Il Sung and his son and successor, Kim Jong Il.

It was proof to the world, the regime believed, of the victory of totalitarian socialism. More importantly, it was also a way to reward the regime's key supporters, and to keep them close.

Pyongyang is a closed city, sealed off by security forces that monitor movement at dozens of checkpoints. North Koreans cannot move there, or even visit, without official permission. Its estimated 3 million residents have been vetted for their ideological purity, or at least their connections to the inner circle.

In many ways, the capital is a complex mixture of facade and reality: blackouts remain commonplace in many neighborhoods; backstreets are dusty and potholed; the outsides of many apartment buildings are splattered with patches of mold.

But life is also far less grim than in the rest of the country. If nothing else, there is the appearance of opportunity.

Top officials in the ruling party, the government and the military live in gated neighborhoods closed to outsiders. They shop in stores filled with goods, and sing karaoke in wood-paneled restaurants. They live and work in constant proximity to power, opening up channels for professional promotion, business opportunities and black market profits.

So when the regime needs to ensure support, it knows where it needs to focus.

"The government is privileging Pyongyang as a political strategy," said Glyn Ford, a former European Union parliamentarian and international consultant who travels regularly and widely in North Korea. "The people who live in the capital are the people who count. They're the people who underpin the regime."

Their support is particularly important right now, with the ascension of third-generation leader Kim Jong Un, who clearly sees his political survival linked to improved standards of living.

His grandfather, Kim Il Sung, was an anti-colonial guerrilla who led the country during North Korea's Cold War heyday, when the Soviets showered the country with everything from oil to food. Things grew desperate in the next generation, when Kim Jong Il hardened the police state and launched a nuclear program that made the country an international pariah. He led the country through a mid-1990s famine that foreign economists believe killed hundreds of thousands of people.

Now, with Kim Jong Un's abrupt rise to power, Pyongyang is getting even more.

In just the past few months, the regime has opened the Dolphinarium (which also required a new 30-mile pipeline to pump in fresh seawater), a $19 million amusement park and an elaborate pool-and-water-slide complex. All are filled with adults, and all are wildly popular.

Even in Pyongyang, the top restaurants and karaoke parlors are too expensive for the rank-and-file supporters – everyone from party bureaucrats to low-ranking soldiers to schoolteachers – who also need to be kept happy.

Outside of Pyongyang, certainly, there are no $19 million amusement parks.

Asked what Kaesong residents do for enjoyment, a city official paused to think. There's the pool, Kim Ryong Mun said eventually, though it's really just for children. Finally, he had something: "Many people go outside and have picnics."

Kim, with his faded, blue-striped tie and digital camera hanging from his wrist as a sign of his success, blames international sanctions, imposed because of Pyongyang's nuclear program, for the lack of development.

"We are suffering because of the imperialist powers," he said, standing near his new chauffeur-driven car in the city center. Nearby, an elderly woman pushed a homemade wheelbarrow filled with bricks. A little later, a man rode by on his bicycle, with handmade shovels tied to it with twine.

Kaesong has "the determination to build a more prosperous city," Kim said, reciting a propaganda phrase that has become commonplace since the rise of the latest Kim.

"The problem of electricity is now solved," he said, when pressed about what needed to be done.

But how can that be, if there are only a few hours of power?

"We supply electricity in the evening, so people can enjoy their lives," he said. During the daytime, he added, the electricity goes to small factories. "This is normal."

On a recent evening, most lights were out by 10 p.m. Occasionally, though, you could see the orange glow of a cigarette, as a cyclist smoked as he rode home in the darkness.

And somewhere to the north, the lights of Pyongyang's amusement parks shone brightly.

 

source huff post

How Pwajok clinches Plateau North senatorial bye election

Gyang Pwajok


The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Sunday declared the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s candidate in the Plateau North Senatorial bye-election, Gyang Pwajok the winner of the elections held in six local government areas which constitute the northern senatorial zone.

Candidates representing six political parties – Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN), People’s Democratic Party (PDP), All Progressive Grand Alliance (APGA), Democratic People’s Party (DPP), All Nigeria People’s Party (ANPP) and the Labour Party (LP), contested election to replace Senator Gyang Dantong, who died on July 8, in a stampede when gunmen attacked mourners at Maseh, a village in Riyom District.

However, only three candidates contested the bye-election for the vacant position in the state house of assembly.

In spite of the heavy downpour, the electorates were not deterred as they troop out to exercise their civic rights to cast their votes. The young and the old were all out to determine the representative in their zone.

Security arrangement was beef up with security chiefs going round the zone to ensure that there was no breach of peace, with plateau state police commissioner, Dipo Ayeni leading the patrol team on inspection.

Announcing the results for the senatorial bye-election at the INEC collation centre in Jos, the Returning Officer for the zone, Professor Fatima Sawa of Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi pronounced the PDP candidate as winners having scored majority votes and satisfied the requirements according to the electoral law.

The PDP candidate, Pwajok polled 195,349 votes to floor other contestants who polled the following votes; Colonel John Dungs (rtd) of DPP – 38,847; Chris Giwa  of APGA – 36,245; Danladi Atu of ANPP – 30,132; Jonathan Yusufu Pam of CAN – 27,609; Dah Adeh Lumumba of LP – 25,527

In the Plateau state house of assembly elections for Barkin Ladi constituency, Kaneng Gyang Fulani of PDPemerged winners with 33, 549 votes to defeat two other contestants, Bulus Bot of DPP with 6, 718 and Ezekiel Gyang of ACN with 4, 267

BAKASSI: Why Nigeria can’t appeal the ICJ verdict – Robert Clarke


Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Chief Robert Clarke (SAN), who is the Principal Partner, Paiko & Co, implores the Federal Government to resettle Nigerians living in Bakassi instead of allowing a revolt which, according to him, may have a spiral effect in the country. The septuagenarian, in this interview, insists that Nigeria erred by submitting to the International Court of Justice(ICJ) and has no option than to abide by the decision of the ICJ on the peninsula. Excerpts:
Some believe that Nigeria traded off Bakassi. Do you think that was right?
I will not say whether somebody was right or wrong but I will first like to analyse the facts. The question is that at the  time former President Obasanjo decided to enter into the Green-Tree Agreement with Cameroun, what were the facts, the fact on ground was that there was a judgment of the International Court of Justice in 2002.
By majority decision in which our eminent jurist Ajibola sat, it ruled that Bakassi did not belong to Nigeria, nothing was done on that judgment since 2002. By 2005, Obasanjo felt he should look at it. I am not holding brief for him but the fact is that by 1914 when Nigeria became one nation, the map of Nigeria as at that time did not contain Bakassi.  So, Bakassi was not part of Nigeria.
But at what time did Bakassi become part of Nigeria? If Nigeria became a nation in 1914, and Bakassi was not part of it, and it later became part of Nigeria, we need to know under what circumstances.  Bakassi later became part of Nigeria in 1918 when Hitler’s colonies all over Africa were taken away from the Germans- Tanzania, Namibia, Togo and Cameroun were German territories up to November 1919.
And by the Amnesty treaty, the League of Nations decided to take away all the German colonies in Africa and brought them under the trusteeship of the League of Nations. So, the League of Nations said they had taken all these territories from the Germans, and who is going to look after them? At that time, they divided Togo into two as well as Cameroun.
Gold Coast took over half of Togo while they gave the Northern Cameroun to Nigeria and they gave the other part to France. That was how Bakassi became part of Nigeria as a ‘trusteeship’ entity and not as a separate entity. Now, in 1958 when Ghana was to become independent, the United Nations asked the Togolese, ‘Do you want to remain in Ghana (Gold Coast) or you want to go back to the French territories ‘as Togo because Togo had not gotten independent then, it was under the French rule?

Chief Robert Clarke
They decided that they didn’t want to go back to Togo. It is just like Nigeria where you have the Anagoge and Yoruba in Benin Republic, do we say because they are Yoruba, they are Nigerians? No. They opted to stay in Ghana. In 1960, Nigerian was to become independent and Nigeria as an entity to be independent was devoid of Bakassi. If they granted us independence, it would only be the area Nigeria was in 1914. So, they asked the same question that ‘you Camerounians, do you want to remain in Nigeria or you want to go back to the French  territories’? (then Cameroun had not taken independence).
The Northern Camerounians decided to stay with Nigeria, but the Easterners who are the Bakassi and West Cameroun, as they were known then said no, that they had not been treated well by the regional government. Of course they were not the only ones that complained,  Cross River also complained. So, they opted to go back to the French Cameroun.
There was a plebiscite and it was approved by the United Nations. That was the legal position of the area as at 1960. The question then became how are we going to re-draw Nigeria’s map? The problem however started in 1966 when General Yakubu Gowon took over government. The gendarmes thought that since Nigeria was at war, it was time to attack Nigeria, so they sent soldiers into Bakassi.
Gowon told them that he did not want to fight a war, he was already fighting a civil war and he said ‘let us divide Bakassi into two so that we both keep our part’. It is also a wrong notion when people say that Gowon sold out Bakassi. When Shagari came in, nothing was done, and when Abacha came in, the gendarmes attacked again, and Abacha wanted to fight a war, they showed him that Nigeria can’t fight a war because we don’t own it.
So, Abacha set up a panel with Akinjide, Ajibola and others as members to look into it and they decided that we had a better title than the Camerounians and that was what led them to submitting to the World Court on the notion that history is the cornerstone of Nigeria rulership. That was the greatest mistake Nigeria made by submitting to the World Court. You are bound to carry out the judgment; if you don’t, the United Nations Security Council will enforce it.
So, Obasanjo, who knew all the facts, and with his wide experience internationally, he opted to make the best out of nothing. According to him, ‘we have spent so much to develop the area, we cannot just lose out completely, let us agree on some economic terms’ and they drew out a 20-year economic term whereby they allotted certain oil blocs to Nigeria and, after 20 years, it will be reviewed. Obasanjo did not take any step in isolation; he was acting in pursuant to the international law.
What options are then open for Nigeria and what is the position of self-determination of the people in all of these?
Under international law, wherever you settle down, you are bound by the law of that area. If you go to Benin Republic today, one-third of the people are Yoruba; would you say they are Nigerians? No. If you go to Equatorial Guinea today, in the good old days, the Igbo  were going there as plantation workers, you have many of them there who have intermarried.
Today,  in that country, half of the population are Igbo. Can we say the Igbo  in that country are Nigerians? Since they have decided to settle there, they must abide by the rules of the country. The fact that the Cross River people moved into Bakassi over 100 years ago to settle down does not mean that they own the place.
The international law has now adjudged that they do not own the place, the best they can do is to accept that they are not the owners and leave the area as their parents have been doing and decide to come back to Nigerian as refugees if they are not happy with the treatment there. Government now owes it as a duty to rehabilitate them when they come back.
That is a duty we owe them because being refugees is not of their own making; it is our government who sold them out to international court. Why should they suffer? If they are being harassed, let the government wade in, build rehabilitation centres for them and set them up. Nigeria has money to spend instead of individuals pocketing the money.
The international court gave us the opportunity that if there is anything wrong in this judgment, we should review it and they will look into it. We never did that, but typical of Nigerians’ way of doing things, you now say you want to appeal in just three weeks.
Was it solely as a result of our complacency or we don’t have a fact to push forward?
One, we don’t have a fact to push forward. Again, the government of Obasanjo has already taken a decision for us in his own wisdom to get the best for Nigeria by signing an economic pact with them. So, there is nothing we can do again. There are certain oil blocs that have been allocated to Nigeria, at least for 20 years. And if you look at the terms of this agreement, it can only be reviewed in 2028. That is the advantage we can leverage on.
But don’t you think the killing of Nigerians in the area by gendarmes is a violation of the Green-Tree Treaty entered into by Cameroun?
That is human behaviour. What is happening in Sierra Leone and Ghana today has nothing to do with Nigerians. The best we can do is to use diplomatic means. Nigeria cannot send any troop into Bakassi today. If we do, the United Nations Security Council will ask us to clear out within 24 hours.
We are not Israel that has been occupying Palestinian state for so many years. There is nothing we can do; we just have to tell ourselves the truth. Apart from asking your people to leave and rehabilitating them, any other thing will be a violation of the international law.
But the people might have felt that they were rather short-changed by the Nigerian Government for not being able to defend them, what is your advice for the people and government of Nigeria on the issue?
My advice is that Nigeria should live up to its obligations. When the Federal Government of Nigeria has entered into economic relationship on Bakassi, she should have allowed her people who want to return to Nigeria do so and let them know that if they return, they are not going to lose anything.
So, instead of allowing organised revolt in another sovereign country, because it may backfire in Nigeria, let our government make arrangement with the neighbouring states like Akwa Ibom, and Cross Rivers, and make available an economic situation where these people can return and be re-settled. Sovereignty is so important in international law that you are bound to obey the laws of the sovereign state.




source - vanguard