Blogger Widgets

Monday, 19 May 2014

LAWYER’S GENERAL DUTIES TO CLIENTS




The rules of professional conduct is made for the maintenance of the highest standard of professional conduct etiquette and discipline in terms of the constitution of the Nigerian Bar Association known as The Legal Practitioners Act (LPA), 2004; The Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (RPC), 2004.
There are several duties expected of a lawyer to a client. These are:
DEDICATION AND DEVOTION TO THE CAUSE OF THE CLIENT – Rule 14
The lawyer owes entire devotion to the interest of the client, warm zeal in the maintenance and defence of the client’s rights and exertion of his utmost learning and ability, to the end that nothing be taken or be withheld from him save by the rules of law legally applied. No fear of judicial disfavor or public unpopularity should restrain him from the full discharge of his duty.
A lawyer should take full instructions from the client before advising him. Advice should be based on merit; a lawyer should always inform the client concerning the progress of his case and where there is no conflict between the client and the lawyer in respect of the exact instructions given to the lawyer, the instruction of the client must prevail. It may be oral or written or both but it is advisable that it should be in writing.
A lawyer shall inform the client that his claim or defence is hopeless if he considers it to be so. Where an action is statute-barred and counsel did not advise his client not to take the action, he could be damnified in costs – Bello Raji v. X (1946) 18 NLR 74.
REPRESENTING CLIENTS WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW – Rule 15
A lawyer may refuse to represent a client where he believes his conduct to be unlawful even though it can be argued to be legal. He shall also keep strictly within the law notwithstanding any plea or instruction from the client, and if the client insists on a breach of law, the lawyer shall withdraw his service.
REPRESENTING CLIENT COMPETENTLY – Rule 16
A lawyer shall not handle a legal matter which he is not competent to handle without associating a lawyer with him who is competent except the client objects or neglect a matter entrusted on him or handle a legal matter without adequate preparation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST – Rule 17
A lawyer has the duty not to disclose to his client any conflicting interest. That is, a lawyer that has accepted a brief from his former client cannot use it against him except where the client, after full disclosure, still wants the lawyer he can act notwithstanding conflict of interest.
In some cases of conflicting interest; the brief must be refused. A lawyer will not be permitted to act against his former client when he has obtained confidential information while acting for him which would be improper and prejudicial to use against him in the service of an adversary. Otherwise, there is no rule that a lawyer cannot act against his former client – Onigbongbo community v. Minister of Lagos Affairs & 31 Others. In Re Chief FR.A. Williams 1972 2 U.I.L.R. 235 (SC).
Conversely, a judge should not preside over a case in which he had previously served as counsel or rendered legal advice unless he had fully disclosed this to the parties – Olue v. Enenwali 1976 2 SC 23.
Counsel should not represent himself in litigation since objectivity and detachment can hardly be maintained – Egbe v. Adefarasin 1987 1 NWLR (Pt. 47).
AGREEMENT WITH CLIENT – Rule 18
A Client may terminate his brief to counsel at any time when he no longer has confidence in him. A client can change his lawyer whether for good cause or not. Where a counsel is debriefed, he owes the court a duty to make a final appearance before the court for a formal withdrawal of his representation – Okonedo – Egharegbarni v. Julius Berger Nig. Ltd (1995) 5 N.W.L.R. (pt 398) 679 at 699.
PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENCE OF A CLIENT- Rule 19
A lawyer must preserve his client’s confidence in the performance of his duty and must not disclose any information without his client’s consent – R v. Egbuabor (1962) 1 All NLR 287 – Where original and translated version of statement of accused to the police was being produced and read in court, accused denied that it is correct. He said what he told the police was that he was sick and could not get up. Defence Counsel then said “I do not object to the statement being tendered. My original instruction was that accused went to tap palm wine on the day ‘in question”. It was held in fairness to counsel it should be said that apart from this lapse he seems to have done his best for the appellant, and we do not suggest that he was guilty of any conscious dereliction of his duty to his client. That cannot alter the fact that by his unauthorized disclosure and his abstention from cross-examination he implied that he himself doubted if the evidence to be given by his client was to be relied on, and it was a miscarriage of justice, as under­stood in this country that he should have continued to represent the appel­lant without the appellant’s being aware that the counsel to whom he looked to present his case had, from his point of view, gone over to the enemy.
In the circumstances we consider that the conviction must be set aside, but there was a substantial case against the appellant, and the order we make is that the conviction is quashed and the appellant is to be retried before another Judge of the Western Region High Court.
Section 170(1) of the Evidence Act has to do with professional communication. It provides that  “no legal practitioner shall at any time be permitted, unless with his client’s express consent, to disclose and communication made to him in the course and for the purpose of his employment as such legal practitioner by or on behalf of his client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him to his client in the course and for the purpose of such employment; provided that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure – (a) any such communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose. (b) any fact observed by any legal practitioner in the course of his employment as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his employment.”
The exceptions to this rule is:
1)      It does not extend to suppression of a crime or fraud – Annesley v. Earl of Anglesea (1743) L.R.Q.B 317.
2)      If the information is not a confidential nature.
3)      If it is meant to be communicated to a 3rd party.
4)      If a legal practitioner is accused by his client.
5)      If the communication is of an illegal purpose.

LAWYER AS A WITNESS FOR A CLIENT – Rule 20
Under section 173 of Evidence Act, a lawyer is a competent but no compellable witness for his client – Gachi & Ors v. The State (1965) NMLR 39. A lawyer is not to act in any litigation where he or a member of his firm would be or may be called as a witness except where he is to testify to an uncounted matter or as regards to the nature and value of legal services rendered.
WITHDRAWAL FROM EMPLOYMENT – Rule 21
A lawyer can only withdraw from employment, once assumed, for good cause and after reasonable notice to the client.
“Good Cause’ includes where the client insists upon an unjust or immoral counsel in the conduct of his case, or if he persists over the lawyer’s remonstrances in presenting frivolous defence, or if he deliberately disregards an agreement or obligation as to fees and expenses”. Upon withdrawal, lawyer should refund such part of the retainer as has not been clearly earned.
CALLING AT CLIENT’S HOUSE OR PLACE OF BUSINESS – Rule 22
A lawyer has the duty to take instructions from a client in chambers and not the client’s house except for urgent reasons e.g. where the client is ill, where it has to do with family relations, etc.
DEALING WITH CLIENT’S PROPERTY – Rule 23
A lawyer who collects money for his client, or is in position to deliver property on behalf of his client, shall promptly report and account for it and shall not mix such money or property with or use it as, his own.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR LITIGATION – Rule 24
A lawyer has the duty to accept a brief in the court in which the lawyer practices, subject to payment of proper professional fee otherwise called the cab bank rule – Rondell v. worsley (1967) 3 All ER 993. The rule provides that special circumstance may justify his refusal, at his discretion to accept a brief e.g. personal interest, conflicting interest, religious grounds, etc. Refusal on other grounds may be unprofessional conduct. It is therefore his duty to undertake defence of a crime regardless of the guilt of the crime except those of suspicious circumstances e.g. personal interest, non-payment of fees, etc. – Udo v. The State (1988) (Pt. 82) 316; Udofia v. The State (1988) 2 NEEIII.
In the absence of express limitation, an instruction to a lawyer confers upon him the power to do all such things as he considers necessary within the scope of his instructions to obtain the most favourable result for the client. Thus, he can compromise a suit or withdraw an appeal without further reference to his client. He can determine what accommodations to be granted to the opposing lawyer to the exclusion of his client, provided the merits of the case are unaffected and the client is not prejudiced.
The basis of the Counsel’s right (not duty) to control incidents of trial is the presumption of the client’s confidence in the counsel – Edozien v. Edozien (1993) 1.N.W.L.R. (pt 272) 678 at 693.
INVESTIGATION OF FACTS AND PRODUCTION OF WITNESS, ETC – Rule 25
A lawyer has a duty to thoroughly investigate and marshal out facts stated by client including interview of potential witnesses for his client or for the opposing side. It is inadvisable that counsel should meet his client’s witnesses for the first time in court.
LAWYERS DUTIES ON ACCOUNTABILITY AND COSTS/CHARGES
DUTY TO OPEN CLIENT ACCOUNT
A Lawyer has the duty to open a separate Bank account for the keeping of money received on behalf of a client and should make no withdrawal from it unless permitted by the Rules. A lawyer who breaches this provision could have his name struck off the roll even though there has been no criminal trial or conviction. In Re a Solicitor 121 Sol.J0376. Decided 25th May 1977, A bank cannot have recourse to the Legal Practitioners client's account to recover any indebtedness of the legal practitioner to the bank unless the indebtedness arose in connection with the account – Section 20(1) of Legal Practitioners Act.

The Legal Practitioners’ Remuneration Committee is empowered under section 15 of the LPA to make orders regulating fees of legal practitioners.
Charges means any charges (whether be way of fees, disbursements, expenses or otherwise) in respect of anything done by a legal practitioner in his capacity as a legal practitioner – section 19 of the LPA.

FEES FOR LEGAL SERVICES
It should be noted that where a lawyer collects money for his client, or is in position to deliver property on behalf of his client, he shall promptly report and account for it and shall not mix such money or property with or use it as his own – Rule 23(2) of RPC.

FIXING THE AMOUNT OF THE FEE
A lawyer is entitled to be paid adequate remuneration for his service to his client – Rule 48(1). But he shall not collect any illegal or excessive fee – Rule 48(2).
The professional fee charged by a lawyer for his services shall be reasonable and commensurate for his services. Accordingly, a lawyer should not charge fees which are excessively high or too low to amount to understanding except where the low fee is for a relation or family – Rule 52(1).

DIVISION OF FEES
A lawyer shall not share the fees of his legal services except with another lawyer based upon the division of service or responsibility – Rule 53.
                                                          
LETTER WRITING
Practitioners are required to draft letters of various kinds, ranging from a covering letter to a letter before a civil action. In drafting letters, the conventions governing letter writing such as layout, salutation and complimentary close must be adhered to. Since the practitioner acts on behalf of a client in a professional capacity, the letter should be written in plain English. It should never be conversational; thus, can’t, won’t, they’re, and so on, should not be used. Such an informal style of writing is inappropriate. In Weston v. Central Criminal court, Courts Administrator (1977) 1 QB 32 at 39, the Court of Appeal observed that the letter was discourteous and rude.
Every letter should bear a date. The day should be written in figures, the month in words and the year in figures. The month and year should not be abbreviated but be written in full. Dates should not be punctuated. However, it is permissible to insert a comma after the month. The month should be written out in words, while the day and year should be written in figures.
A letter must bear a heading or caption, for example, if a client is being informed about progress in a suit, then the heading of the letter will be the suit number and the parties to the suit
Letters written for a firm should be written in either the first person singular, that is “I” or in the first person plural “We”. Where it is intended that the letter should be read only by the addressee, the expression ‘Strictly Private and Confidential’, should be written on it.
No letter must be dispatched unsigned. A letter must be signed either by the writer or on his behalf.
There are two types of letters namely Simple (social or informal) letters; and Business (official or formal) letters.
Simple letters are those written to friends and relatives conveying a personal message while business letters are more formal than simple letters.
CHECKLISTS OF GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD LAWYER’S LETTER TO CLIENT
To write a good letter, one would have to look at the parts of a letter which are:
1)      Letterhead – This contains the names, address, references, and qualifications of the writer. It must be simple and sober.
2)      Date – The applicable mode in Nigeria is: the day, month (written in words), and year e.g. 4 December 2009.
3)      References – This is usually inserted. It is helpful when filing and making cross-references.
4)      Status of the letter – The word private and confidential (if necessary) should be included.
5)      Name and address of the recipient – Identify the reader by name, title or both.
6)      Salutation – The level of familiarity would consider what to salute with e.g. Dear Sir, Dear Mr. ABC.
7)      Subject head – This should give a summary of what the letter contains. It is recommended to be in sentence style capitalization and not in capital letters except where absolutely necessary e.g. My Expectation In Law School.
8)      Body of the letter – This is the bulk part of the letter which can be grouped under the following heads:
a)The opening – introduce or acknowledge the content of the letter.
b)   The middle – the actual message which may be one or more paragraphs (numbering is also accepted).
c)The closing – this is the expected action from the recipient.
9)      Complimentary closure of the letter – This is the choice or the mode of salutation. It should be noted that the closure is a determinant factor of the salutation. For example, Dear Sir closes with Yours faithfully; Dear Mr. ABC closes with Yours truly, etc.
10)  Name and signature of the writer – It is advisable to always sign on top of the name. When signing on behalf of someone, you must indicate it by adding the word “for”. For example, For: Mr. ABC. However, the expression “pp” is used in some cases.
11)  Enclosure – Where you enclose or attach other documents, you should indicate that fact and you may list or omit the list of the documents. (Encl is the short form of Enclosure).
12)  Copies – This is used where there is need to notify other persons about the message in the letter. It is known as the distribution list. (CC is the short form of Copies). It is also used to notify the recipient that same copy has been sent to other persons. But where a blind copy is to be sent to other persons, nothing should be shown on the letter.
HINTS ON WRITING LETTERS
1.      Be careful about your choice of words or spelling, and place all punctuations properly.
2.      Be polite, purposeful and firm. Also avoid over familiarity.
3.      Be brief, and as much as possible, restrict your letter to one page.

4.      A good letter should have only one paragraph but where several paragraphs are necessary, each paragraph should contain only one idea distinct from other paragraphs.

PURPOSE OF AN EFFECTVE CLIENT INTERVIEWING AND COUNSELLING



This is to help the potential client air his or her concerns, the interview must be conducted effectively.
Legal interviewing is a medium of communication between a practitioner and a potential client. A client may consult a practitioner with a matter which he or she believes relates to law, but which has nothing to do with law, in which the legal practitioner is to aid the client to the right place.
1)      To form an attorney-client relationship – this has to do with three level viz.: personal, educational, and contractual. It is personal where you and the client come to understand each other, that is, you have to know each other very well in the course of interviewing and counselling. It is educational where you explain to the client what is involved in practice, for instance, fiduciary relationship, confidentiality, etc. finally, it is contractual where the client agrees to hire you and pay for your fees and expenses incurred.
2)      To learn the client’s goals – know what the client wants and explain the best options to him.
3)      To learn as much as the client knows about the facts – this is the major aim of the interview.
4)      To reduce the client’s anxiety without being unrealistic – give the client the feeling that you can help with the matter but do not assure him that you must win the case as this will be unethical.
CRITERIA OF AN EFFECTVE CLIENT INTERVIEWING AND COUNSELLING
A practitioner must comply with the law and rules of professional conduct when consulted by a potential client to handle a matter.
First, he or she must ascertain whether there is any conflict of interest with existing clients. If there is, a legal practitioner is to decline the matter. A violation of this will constitute professional misconduct – Rule 17.
A legal practitioner must also ensure the potential client’s matter does not involve illegality, crime or fraud. A legal practitioner should decline where the matter involves one or any of these.
Legal practitioners must be frank in dealing with potential clients. If it is a field where the legal practitioner lacks knowledge, the legal practitioner should decline to the matter.
A legal practitioner should endeavour to obtain full knowledge of his client’s cause before advising thereon, and he is bound to give candid opinion of the merits and probable results of pending or contemplated litigation.
The client must be assured that the facts will be treated confidentially – Fawehinmi v. Nigerian Bar Association & Ors. (1989) 2 NWLR (Pt. 105) 558.
Advise is to be given on the possible courses of action and the client decides on the course of action to take.
To handle a client’s matter, the practitioner may need to interview other people who possess information or can provide explanations relating to it.
The legal practitioner must possess analytical skill, and the ability to articulate clearly and advice being offered.
STAGES FOR AN EFFECTIVE CLIENT INTERVIEWING
According to Avrom Sherr’s stage-model of interviewing, there are three stages namely: listening, questioning, and advising.
Listening stage is done in order to gather information from the client about the facts of the matter and the client’s feeling about the matter. In this stage, the lawyer greets the client, makes him comfortable and introduces him or herself and any other lawyer who will be involved in handling the matter then the legal practitioner elicits with open questions.
Questioning stage is to use questions to fill in any gaps, clarify ambiguities and inadequacies in the client’s narrated facts. In the stage both the client and legal practitioner participates but the legal practitioner participates more. He questions the client on the facts for gaps, depth, background, ambiguities and relevance by use of closed and open questions. He then summarises the facts to the client in a language which he the client understands.
Advising stage is to advise the client on the practical and legal effects of the matter and suggests a plan of action. The legal practitioner must ensure that the client understands the advice and that he or she chooses one of the possible courses of action. The legal practitioner shall obtain an agreement on fees and costs that will be incurred. He should require the client to do a follow-up work and ask if there is any other business before ending the interview.
After the interview, a full note of everything that occurred at the interview should be made.
PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR A CLIENT’S INTERVIEW
1)      Greet, seat and introduce the client
2)      Elicit story with opening question
3)      Listen carefully to basic outline of personalities and case from client’s own unhindered words
4)      Question the client on facts for gaps, depth, background, ambiguities and relevance
5)      Sum up and recount your view of facts and check for client’s agreement, or amend
6)      Take notes
7)      State and advice or plan of action and deal with questions of funds
8)      Repeat advice or plan of action and check for client’s agreement or amend
9)      Recount follow-up work to be done by client
10)  Recount follow-up work to be done by a legal practitioner
11)  State next contact between legal practitioner and client
12)  Ask if there is any other business and deal with it, if any

13)  Terminate the interview, help the client out and say goodbye.

Sunday, 18 May 2014

LAWYER AS A WITNESS FOR A CLIENT



Under section 173 of Evidence Act, a lawyer is a competent but no compellable witness for his client – Gachi & Ors v. The State (1965) NMLR 39. A lawyer is not to act in any litigation where he or a member of his firm would be or may be called as a witness except where he is to testify to an uncounted matter or as regards to the nature and value of legal services rendered.
WITHDRAWAL FROM EMPLOYMENT – Rule 21
A lawyer can only withdraw from employment, once assumed, for good cause and after reasonable notice to the client.
"Good Cause' includes where the client insists upon an unjust or immoral counsel in the conduct of his case, or if he persists over the lawyer's remonstrances in presenting frivolous defence, or if he deliberately disregards an agreement or obligation as to fees and expenses". Upon withdrawal, lawyer should refund such part of the retainer as has not been clearly earned.
CALLING AT CLIENT’S HOUSE OR PLACE OF BUSINESS – Rule 22
A lawyer has the duty to take instructions from a client in chambers and not the client’s house except for urgent reasons e.g. where the client is ill, where it has to do with family relations, etc.
DEALING WITH CLIENT’S PROPERTY – Rule 23
A lawyer who collects money for his client, or is in position to deliver property on behalf of his client, shall promptly report and account for it and shall not mix such money or property with or use it as, his own.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR LITIGATION – Rule 24
A lawyer has the duty to accept a brief in the court in which the lawyer practices, subject to payment of proper professional fee otherwise called the cab bank rule – Rondell v. worsley (1967) 3 All ER 993. The rule provides that special circumstance may justify his refusal, at his discretion to accept a brief e.g. personal interest, conflicting interest, religious grounds, etc. Refusal on other grounds may be unprofessional conduct. It is therefore his duty to undertake defence of a crime regardless of the guilt of the crime except those of suspicious circumstances e.g. personal interest, non-payment of fees, etc. – Udo v. The State (1988) (Pt. 82) 316; Udofia v. The State (1988) 2 NEEIII.
In the absence of express limitation, an instruction to a lawyer confers upon him the power to do all such things as he considers necessary within the scope of his instructions to obtain the most favourable result for the client. Thus, he can compromise a suit or withdraw an appeal without further reference to his client. He can determine what accommodations to be granted to the opposing lawyer to the exclusion of his client, provided the merits of the case are unaffected and the client is not prejudiced.
The basis of the Counsel's right (not duty) to control incidents of trial is the presumption of the client's confidence in the counsel – Edozien v. Edozien (1993) 1.N.W.L.R. (pt 272) 678 at 693.
INVESTIGATION OF FACTS AND PRODUCTION OF WITNESS, ETC – Rule 25

A lawyer has a duty to thoroughly investigate and marshal out facts stated by client including interview of potential witnesses for his client or for the opposing side. It is inadvisable that counsel should meet his client's witnesses for the first time in court.

LAWYER’S DUTIES TO THE CLIENT



The rules of professional conduct is made for the maintenance of the highest standard of professional conduct etiquette and discipline in terms of the constitution of the Nigerian Bar Association.
DEDICATION AND DEVOTION TO THE CAUSE OF THE CLIENT – Rule 14
The lawyer owes entire devotion to the interest of the client, warm zeal in the maintenance and defence of the client’s rights and exertion of his utmost learning and ability, to the end that nothing be taken or be withheld from him save by the rules of law legally applied. No fear of judicial disfavor or public unpopularity should restrain him from the full discharge of his duty.
A lawyer should take full instructions from the client before advising him. Advice should be based on merit; a lawyer should always inform the client concerning the progress of his case and where there is no conflict between the client and the lawyer in respect of the exact instructions given to the lawyer, the instruction of the client must prevail. It may be oral or written or both but it is advisable that it should be in writing.
A lawyer shall inform the client that his claim or defence is hopeless if he considers it to be so. Where an action is statute-barred and counsel did not advise his client not to take the action, he could be damnified in costs – Bello Raji v. X (1946) 18 NLR 74.
REPRESENTING CLIENTS WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW – Rule 15
A lawyer may refuse to represent a client where he believes his conduct to be unlawful even though it can be argued to be legal. He shall also keep strictly within the law notwithstanding any plea or instruction from the client, and if the client insists on a breach of law, the lawyer shall withdraw his service.
REPRESENTING CLIENT COMPETENTLY – Rule 16
A lawyer shall not handle a legal matter which he is not competent to handle without associating a lawyer with him who is competent except the client objects or neglect a matter entrusted on him or handle a legal matter without adequate preparation.


CONFLICT OF INTEREST – Rule 17
A lawyer has the duty not to disclose to his client any conflicting interest. That is, a lawyer that has accepted a brief from his former client cannot use it against him except where the client, after full disclosure, still wants the lawyer he can act notwithstanding conflict of interest.
In some cases of conflicting interest; the brief must be refused. A lawyer will not be permitted to act against his former client when he has obtained confidential information while acting for him which would be improper and prejudicial to use against him in the service of an adversary. Otherwise, there is no rule that a lawyer cannot act against his former client – Onigbongbo community v. Minister of Lagos Affairs & 31 Others. In Re Chief FR.A. Williams 1972 2 U.I.L.R. 235 (SC).
Conversely, a judge should not preside over a case in which he had previously served as counsel or rendered legal advice unless he had fully disclosed this to the parties – Olue v. Enenwali 1976 2 SC 23.
Counsel should not represent himself in litigation since objectivity and detachment can hardly be maintained – Egbe v. Adefarasin 1987 1 NWLR (Pt. 47).
AGREEMENT WITH CLIENT – Rule 18
A Client may terminate his brief to counsel at any time when he no longer has confidence in him. A client can change his lawyer whether for good cause or not. Where a counsel is debriefed, he owes the court a duty to make a final appearance before the court for a formal withdrawal of his representation – Okonedo - Egharegbarni v. Julius Berger Nig. Ltd (1995) 5 N.W.L.R. (pt 398) 679 at 699.
PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENCE OF A CLIENT- Rule 19
A lawyer must preserve his client’s confidence in the performance of his duty and must not disclose any information without his client’s consent – R v. Egbuabor (1962) 1 All NLR 287 - Where original and translated version of statement of accused to the police was being produced and read in court, accused denied that it is correct. He said what he told the police was that he was sick and could not get up. Defence Counsel then said "I do not object to the statement being tendered. My original instruction was that accused went to tap palm wine on the day 'in question". It was held in fairness to counsel it should be said that apart from this lapse he seems to have done his best for the appellant, and we do not suggest that he was guilty of any conscious dereliction of his duty to his client. That cannot alter the fact that by his unauthorized disclosure and his abstention from cross-examination he implied that he himself doubted if the evidence to be given by his client was to be relied on, and it was a miscarriage of justice, as under­stood in this country that he should have continued to represent the appel­lant without the appellant’s being aware that the counsel to whom he looked to present his case had, from his point of view, gone over to the enemy.
In the circumstances we consider that the conviction must be set aside, but there was a substantial case against the appellant, and the order we make is that the conviction is quashed and the appellant is to be retried before another Judge of the Western Region High Court.
Section 170(1) of the Evidence Act has to do with professional communication. It provides that  “no legal practitioner shall at any time be permitted, unless with his client’s express consent, to disclose and communication made to him in the course and for the purpose of his employment as such legal practitioner by or on behalf of his client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he has become acquainted in the course and for the purpose of his professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him to his client in the course and for the purpose of such employment; provided that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure – (a) any such communication made in furtherance of any illegal purpose. (b) any fact observed by any legal practitioner in the course of his employment as such, showing that any crime or fraud has been committed since the commencement of his employment.”
The exceptions to this rule is:
1)      It does not extend to suppression of a crime or fraud – Annesley v. Earl of Anglesea (1743) L.R.Q.B 317.
2)      If the information is not a confidential nature.
3)      If it is meant to be communicated to a 3rd party.
4)      If a legal practitioner is accused by his client.

5)      If the communication is of an illegal purpose.