CASE
THEORY/TRIAL PLAN
A case theory is an aggregate of facts that have come to one as a legal
practitioner. This is looking at facts and deducing facts favourable to the
line of argument one intends to pursue.
This is identified from statements of the accused and potential
witnesses (unlike in a civil case where theory of the case is determined via
the pleadings), charge sheet, proof of evidence, and reports of scientific
investigation.
A trial plan is a means by which one’s theory of the case can be
determined. It is akin to a strategy and guide that serves the purpose of achieving
the theory of the case. The strategy which counsel wishes to use to achieve the
set goal of either prosecution or defence determines a trial plan.
Once a counsel is certain about what his case entails, it is advisable
to draw up a trial plan. An effective way of translating a trial plan into
writing is to draw up a chart containing the most important or key points of
the plan.
The relationship between case theory and a trial plan is that the trial
plan is a means by which one’s theory of the case can be achieved, that is, the
means to the end. Thus, the trial plan should ideally not be inconsistent with
the theory of the case.
PROCEDURE FOR
PREPARING A TRIAL PLAN
For example, preparing a trial plan for the defence using conspiracy
and murder –
1.
The first column on your chart should be
allocated to the charge. Within it, attempt a concise definition of the
offences of conspiracy and murder.
2.
The second column should indicate the law – both
statutory and case law – which defines the offence, delimits its scope and
furnishes the ingredients as well as the defence.
3.
The third column should deal with likely
evidence for the prosecution and for the defendant. The aim of this column is
to weigh or gauge the relative strength and weakness of your case.
4.
The fourth column should deal with should deal
with matters which you wish to emphasize at address stage, barring the sudden
occurrence of the unexpected, like the prosecution introducing a witness not
named in the indictment but whose evidence is none the less devastating. Or, if
a prosecutor, there should be fall back option should the defence succeed in
doing some damage in cross-examination. (click on any picture on your right or left for more insight)
A TRIAL PLAN BASED ON ENE AGBO
SCENARIO
OFFENCE
|
INGREDIENTS
|
LAW
|
EVIDENCE
|
PENALTY
|
PRAYER
|
REMARKS
|
Assault
|
|
S. 265 Penal Code
|
|
3 years imprisonment
|
Accused should be convicted
|
|
Theft
|
|
S. 287 Penal Code
|
|
5 years imprisonment
|
Accused should be convicted
|
|
Rape
|
|
S. 283 of Penal Code. Majekodunmi v. R, R v. Malory
|
|
Life imprisonment with fine
|
Accused should be convicted
|
Fall back o back to indecent
assault if no if no
penetration is is is proved.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment